Prove · baseline BL-045
Demand Qualification
Demand Qualification, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $11.27m claimed · $9.85m realized · $5.62m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.45m | $1.31m | not verified | Not verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $2.11m | $1.83m | $1.63m | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q4-0091 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $2.70m | $2.16m | $1.73m | Partly verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | JV-2026Q1-0092 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $3.21m | $2.83m | $2.26m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2026Q2-0093 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.80m | $1.73m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $319.4k | $300.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $463.9k | $389.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $593.1k | $510.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $707.2k | $495.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $395.4k | $351.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 125,463. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.