Prove · baseline BL-031
Developer Experience
Developer Experience, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $13.59m claimed · $11.34m realized · $7.07m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.75m | $1.35m | $1.20m | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q3-0068 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $2.54m | $2.16m | $2.03m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2025Q4-0069 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $3.25m | $2.60m | not verified | Not verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $3.88m | $3.84m | $3.84m | Verified | Within tolerance Claimed, realized and verified agree inside the tolerance the controller set for this account. | JV-2026Q2-0070 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $2.17m | $1.39m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $385.2k | $315.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $559.5k | $369.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $715.4k | $493.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $853.0k | $699.4k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $476.9k | $314.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened over a sample of 181,415. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.