LensReading which lens this session carries.

Prove · baseline BL-022

Service Desk

Service Desk, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. Owner at the time of measurement: Director, Service Desk.

Baseline register
Status
Locked and signed
confidence 0.80
Cost per unit
$45.16
141,661 units in the window
Cycle time
36.8 hrs
pre-agent, measured end to end
Quality
88.3%
service level attainment
Claimed on this baseline
$15.15m
$6.55m independently verified
Posted to the ledger
3 of 5
cash lines with a journal reference

How it was measured

Invoice reconstruction

Method
Invoice reconstruction
Method note
Vendor invoices, contractor timesheets and purchase orders re-added for the window and tied back to the posted ledger balance.
Window
FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks
Sample
12,749
Confidence in the method
0.80

Sign-off

Who accepted this as the number to beat

Status
Locked and signed
Signed by
Ana Duarte
Role
Group Financial Controller
Signed
18.1 months ago
Caveat carried with the number
Locked and signed. The window is a full quarter and the method leaves an audit trail that can be re-performed.

Where the benefit lands

Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to

General ledger account
6500 · Outsourced services, shared centers
Managed-service fees for the shared towers. Volume-priced, so a throughput change moves this account within one billing cycle.
Corporate GL · Third party · owner Sofia Lindqvist, Finance Business Partner, Operations
Cost center
CC-4030 · Information Technology
Global · owner Daniel Okoye · annual budget $24.46m
Information Technologyfunction viewEV-BL-022evidence chain

Benefit lines resting on this baseline

5 lines · $15.15m claimed · $12.38m realized · $6.55m verified

PeriodCategoryClaimedRealizedVerifiedStatusVarianceJournal
FY25 Q3Outsourced cost$1.95m$1.85m$1.74mPartly verified
Rate
The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center.
JV-2025Q3-0045
FY25 Q4Outsourced cost$2.84m$2.47m$2.00mPartly verified
Volume
Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim.
JV-2025Q4-0046
FY26 Q1Outsourced cost$3.63m$3.34mnot verifiedNot verified
Scope
Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. The added work is real but it is not this baseline.
not posted
FY26 Q2Outsourced cost$4.32m$3.16m$2.81mPartly verified
Method mismatch
The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. The two are not comparable without a bridge, and no bridge has been built.
JV-2026Q2-0047
FY26 Q3Outsourced cost$2.42m$1.57mnot verifiedPeriod open
Period open
The period is not closed. The realized figure is a run rate, not a result, and nothing in it has been verified.
not posted
What this record is, and what it is not

A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. Modeled numbers demonstrate the instrument and prove nothing about the business case.

The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 12,749. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.

3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.