Prove · baseline BL-015
S2P Control Tower
S2P Control Tower, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
Invoice reconstruction
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
5 lines · $16.77m claimed · $14.16m realized · $9.42m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $2.16m | $1.43m | not verified | Not verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $3.14m | $2.82m | $2.60m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2025Q4-0027 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $4.01m | $3.41m | $2.86m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q1-0028 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $4.78m | $4.31m | $3.96m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2026Q2-0029 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $2.67m | $2.19m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened over a sample of 23,852. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.