Prove · baseline BL-010
Warehouse & Fulfillment
Warehouse & Fulfillment, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $19.71m claimed · $15.98m realized · $9.77m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $2.54m | $2.34m | $1.87m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2025Q3-0018 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $3.69m | $2.29m | not verified | Not verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $4.72m | $3.77m | $3.17m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2026Q1-0019 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $5.62m | $5.57m | $4.73m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q2-0020 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $3.14m | $2.01m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $558.7k | $502.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $811.5k | $673.5k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $1.04m | $902.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $1.24m | $804.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $691.7k | $581.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY25 Q1, thirteen weeks over a sample of 237,965. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.