Prove · baseline BL-005
H2R Control Tower
H2R Control Tower, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $20.33m claimed · $17.97m realized · $13.66m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $2.62m | $1.99m | $1.97m | Verified | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | JV-2025Q3-0012 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $3.80m | $3.61m | $3.29m | Partly verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | JV-2025Q4-0013 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $4.86m | $4.67m | $4.06m | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2026Q1-0014 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $5.80m | $5.10m | $4.34m | Partly verified | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | JV-2026Q2-0015 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $3.24m | $2.59m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $576.1k | $409.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $836.8k | $702.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $1.07m | $856.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $1.28m | $778.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $713.3k | $549.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 331,838. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
4 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.