Prove · baseline BL-002
Learning & Development
Learning & Development, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $24.46m claimed · $19.57m realized · $13.03m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $3.15m | $2.65m | $2.38m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2025Q3-0002 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $4.58m | $4.71m | $3.82m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2025Q4-0003 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $5.85m | $4.10m | $3.28m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q1-0004 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $6.98m | $4.33m | $3.55m | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2026Q2-0005 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $3.90m | $3.78m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $693.3k | $624.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $1.01m | $684.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $1.29m | $901.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $1.54m | $1.32m | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $858.4k | $575.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 231,582. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
4 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.