End-to-end outcomes · one chain
OI-OTC-0100 — Order to cash
One order followed from a customer order is accepted to the cash is applied against the open item, across every function and tower it touched. more
State
Stalled
The chain had room left in the week and did not move. more
Chain cycle
3.8 h
Wall clock, first stage start to last stage end
Of which waiting
0 min
0% of the chain was queue, not work
Cost to serve
$65.32
6 touches over 1 stages
A person intervened
1×
At one stage, marked below
Match confidence
1.00
Single stage
What this chain is, and how sure we are it is one chain
Identity, counterparty and the correlation key
The unit
Northgate Trading Company
United Kingdom · Europe · GBP
Started Wed, Aug 12, 15:44, and has not ended inside the observation window.
How the stages were joined
Single stage · 1.00
The chain never found a second document, so nothing was matched and no confidence was earned. more
A chain is only as sure as its weakest join, so the figure above is the minimum across the 0 joins below, not their average.
How much of the service ran
1 / 5
1 function · 1 tower
4 of the 5 stages were never found; the chain stops after delivery raised. That is the chain as observed, not proof the work did not happen elsewhere.
The chain, stage by stage
1 stage · 0 min waiting · 3.8 h in work
01Order accepted a person intervened
CG-O2C-000167Sales ordererp-mmSalesO2CTomas Havel
The chain starts here. more
In work
3.8 h
Touches
6
Handling
manual
Join
Origin
On the document
$15,695
The amounts in the right-hand column are what each document carried, and they are deliberately not added up — the same money is written down once at each of the 1 stages this order passed through. This service counts value once, at invoice issued, which puts $0 against this chain.
Where a person intervened
1 of 1 stages were not touchless
Order accepted
manual
Tomas Havel · Sales · Order-to-Cash · 6 touches over 3.8 h
Across the 1 complete chains of this service the median is 0, so this one sits above the middle. A stage counts here when its handling is assisted or manual; touchless stages are excluded.
What the time and the money went on
The chain decomposed
Waiting
0 min
0% of elapsed time
In work
3.8 h
100% of elapsed time
Waiting and work are an exhaustive split of the 3.8 h this chain took — every hour is in one bucket or the other.
Cost to serve, $65.32
6 touches at 11 minutes of loaded time each$63.80
1 stages of inference and system cost$1.52
Cost to serve is modeled from the touches the ledger recorded, not billed from a timesheet. more
No stage on this chain raised an exception.
The same chain for the whole week, as a distribution
1 complete order to cash chains, 10–16 August 2026
this chain sits at the 0th percentile
1
3.0 dten equal bands of chain cycle time3.4 d
Median chain
3.0 d
p25 3.0 d · p75 3.0 d
Slowest tenth
3.0 d
worst seen 3.0 d
Median waiting
2.8 d
94% of the median chain is queue
Median cost
$7.60
p90 $7.60
The mean of 3.0 d sits on the median of 3.0 d, which is why the distribution is drawn rather than reported as an average: the gap between the median and the slowest tenth is 0 min, and it is that tail, not the average, that customers of this service actually feel. This chain is not complete, so it is not in the 1 above. The commitment is 336 hours; no chain started early enough in a one-week window to be judged against it.
The ledger behind these chains is one week, 10 to 16 August 2026, which is 168 hours. A chain that had not finished when the week ended is open, not late: the week simply stopped watching it. A chain whose commitment falls after the end of the week could never have been seen to miss, so its service level reads not measurable rather than holding. Nothing on these pages should be read as a monthly or annual attainment. This chain had not finished when the window closed, so its cycle time is a floor, not a duration — it is right-censored, and it is not counted as a breach anywhere on this platform.