LensReading which lens this session carries.

End-to-end outcomes · one chain

OI-HTP-0039 — Hire to productive

One hire followed from an offer is accepted and a hire event is created to the joiner is paid correctly for a full period, across every function and tower it touched.

Hire to productive — all chains
State
Closed
Every stage of the service was found and the last one finished inside the sampled week.
Chain cycle
5.5 d
Wall clock, first stage start to last stage end
Of which waiting
4.2 d
77% of the chain was queue, not work
Cost to serve
$15.19
1 touches over 3 stages
A person intervened
1×
At one stage, marked below
Match confidence
0.62
Cohort

What this chain is, and how sure we are it is one chain

Identity, counterparty and the correlation key

The unit
Camille Rousseau
France · Europe · EUR
Started Mon, Aug 10, 20:38, ended Sun, Aug 16, 09:08.
How the stages were joined
Cohort · 0.62
The chain crosses a boundary and no usable party join exists on either side.
A chain is only as sure as its weakest join, so the figure above is the minimum across the 2 joins below, not their average.
How much of the service ran
3 / 3
2 functions · 2 towers
Every stage the service defines was found for this unit.

The chain, stage by stage

3 stages · 4.2 d waiting · 31.1 h in work

01Hire recorded
CG-H2R-007233Hire eventhcmHRH2R
The chain starts here.
In work
12.2 h
Touches
0
Handling
touchless
Join
Origin
On the document
$0
Handoff wait before this stage: 40.1 h — nothing was being done to the hire for that time.
02Access granted a person intervened
CG-IT-012627Access requestitsmITITSFarah Zayed
Both sides of this step name a party, and the two namespaces barely meet …
In work
17.5 h
Touches
1
Handling
assisted
Join
Cohort 0.62
On the document
$0
Handoff wait before this stage: 2.6 d — nothing was being done to the hire for that time.
03First pay run
CG-H2R-008339Payroll run itemhcmHRH2R
Both sides of this step name a party, and the two namespaces barely meet …
In work
1.4 h
Touches
0
Handling
touchless
Join
Cohort 0.62
On the document
$90
The amounts in the right-hand column are what each document carried, and they are deliberately not added up — the same money is written down once at each of the 3 stages this hire passed through. This service carries no monetary value at all — it is internal work — so no value figure is shown for it anywhere.

Where a person intervened

1 of 3 stages were not touchless

Access granted
assisted
Farah Zayed · IT · IT Service · 1 touch over 17.5 h
Across the 133 complete chains of this service the median is 1, so this one sits on the middle. A stage counts here when its handling is assisted or manual; touchless stages are excluded.

What the time and the money went on

The chain decomposed

Waiting
4.2 d
77% of elapsed time
In work
31.1 h
23% of elapsed time
Waiting and work are an exhaustive split of the 5.5 d this chain took — every hour is in one bucket or the other. The longest single wait was 2.6 d before first pay run.
Cost to serve, $15.19
1 touches at 11 minutes of loaded time each$10.63
3 stages of inference and system cost$4.56
Cost to serve is modeled from the touches the ledger recorded, not billed from a timesheet.
No stage on this chain raised an exception.

The same chain for the whole week, as a distribution

133 complete hire to productive chains, 10–16 August 2026

this chain sits at the 93rd percentile
5
10
8
32
29
22
9
14
2
2
2.3 dten equal bands of chain cycle time6.7 d
Median chain
4.3 d
p25 3.8 d · p75 4.7 d
Slowest tenth
5.4 d
worst seen 6.7 d
Median waiting
3.4 d
76% of the median chain is queue
Median cost
$15.19
p90 $47.09
The mean of 4.3 d sits above the median of 4.3 d, which is why the distribution is drawn rather than reported as an average: the gap between the median and the slowest tenth is 28.3 h, and it is that tail, not the average, that customers of this service actually feel. The commitment is 720 hours; no chain started early enough in a one-week window to be judged against it.
The ledger behind these chains is one week, 10 to 16 August 2026, which is 168 hours. A chain that had not finished when the week ended is open, not late: the week simply stopped watching it. A chain whose commitment falls after the end of the week could never have been seen to miss, so its service level reads not measurable rather than holding. Nothing on these pages should be read as a monthly or annual attainment. This chain both started and finished inside that week, so its cycle time is a measurement.