LensReading which lens this session carries.

Standard operating procedure · RD2C · Research & Development

Portfolio Bets Position

Judgment procedure owned by Innovation Portfolio in Research & Development. 5 numbered steps, 1 of them a person deciding and 4 of them agent work …

Procedure code

RD2C

Judgment

Rule versions in force

v5.1 · v2.2

2 governing rules stacked over it

In force since

2025-11-10

Earliest effective date across those rules

Last reviewed

2026-05-18

Latest review date across those rules

Rules approved by

1

VP Innovation

Rule health

1/2

0 under review · 1 superseded

There is no document register behind this header. The version, the dates and the approver names are read off the governing rules this procedure runs inside, which is the closest thing the estate holds to a document control record. Nobody wrote these procedures. There is no document library behind this page and no Word file anywhere in the estate. Every procedure below is generated from rows this platform already holds: the line and its ordered stations, the owning team and the person accountable for it, the policy items bound to that team, and the governance gates seeded against the function. The steps, the owners, the gates, the approvers, the dwell times and the volumes are read straight off those rows. The sentences that join them together are generated. Read a procedure as the estate describing itself, not as a document somebody signed.

Purpose and scope

What this procedure is for and where it stops

To run portfolio bets position to one repeatable standard inside Innovation Portfolio, part of Research & Development.

Entry condition

Runs judgment. Starts when a leadership team frames the question.

Exit condition

The unit clears exco ratify, released by VP Innovation.

In scope

  • Every unit of portfolio bets position raised inside Innovation Portfolio, from the trigger below through to the final step.
  • 4 of the 5 steps, which run without a person present.
  • 1 decision that stops the line until a named person releases it.

Out of scope

  • Anything outside the envelope set by the owning team. It leaves the line at a gate and becomes the named approver's decision.
  • Work that belongs to another function. This line records no handoff, so nothing leaves it mid-flow.
  • Shared-spine work. This line has none; every step is done inside the function.

Who owns it

Runs the line

Innovation Portfolio Orchestrator

Accountable person

VP Innovation

The end of the escalation path. Above them sits R&D Chief of Staff for the function.

That team’s remit

Owns program work end to end inside Research & Development.

That remit describes the whole team, not this one procedure, so its counts are larger than the ones on this page.

Autonomy

58% now · ceiling 64%

Agents assemble evidence and even recommend killing a program.

The procedure, step by step

5 numbered steps · 1 of them stop for a person

A step is one station on the line.

No.StepWho does itWhat happensSystem of recordTime on the stepIn flight
01

Frame

Agentstrategy

Idea Intake Agent

Idea Intake Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Product Lifecycle Management40.4 hrsstandard 3.1 days44
02

Model bets

Agentstrategy

Stage Gate Agent

Stage Gate Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Product Lifecycle Management46.9 hrsstandard 3.3 days37
03

Draft position

Agentstrategy

Portfolio Balance Agent

Portfolio Balance Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Product Lifecycle Management34.1 hrsstandard 47.8 hrs36
04

Challenge

Agentstrategy

Resource Allocation Agent

Resource Allocation Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Product Lifecycle Management38.1 hrsstandard 47.7 hrs33
05

ExCo ratify

HumanpolicyDecision

VP Innovation

Releases: VP Innovation

Work stops. VP Innovation reviews what the line has produced and either releases the unit or sends it back. Nothing downstream of this step runs until that decision is made.Holds until: Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the program decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.Product Lifecycle Management4.4 daysstandard 7.2 days7

The swimlane

The same steps, laid out by who is holding the work

Three lanes: a person deciding, an agent working, and the shared services spine.

Person1 station and 40% of the dwellAgent4 stations and 60% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell1 crossing between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Run the procedure

One unit walked along that swimlane on the happy viable agentified path

Press run and a single unit enters at station 01. Each station takes exactly the dwell this platform records for it and is held by whoever the estate says holds it.

speed
worked clock
00:00
allowance clock
00:00
stations cleared
0/5
the happy path, worked time0 min of 11.1 days
the same run against its allowance0 min of 17.6 days
Human
decides · 1
Agent
does the work · 4
GBS
shared spine · 0
run log

Nothing has happened yet.

where the worked time goes11.1 days a unit
Person4.4 days · 40%Agent6.6 days · 60%1 crossing between lanes
what makes this path viable
  • The lanes are the recorded lanes. 1 of the 5 stations stop for a person and every one of them still does on this run.
  • Every one of the 1 decision is still taken by the person who holds it. The happy path is that each one is released first time, not that it is skipped.
  • The owning team is held to a 64% autonomy ceiling and this run sits at 60% unattended, inside it.
  • 1 system is attributed across the stations, and 0 of them are connected. Nothing in this run has been watched executing against a real system of record.
what would have to change

One decision, held by VP Innovation.

stays with a person
  • 05 ExCo ratify — The last decision on the line. Something on every procedure ends with a person, so this one is never offered.
what this run is, and what it is not

This is a run, not a forecast.

Happy means nothing goes wrong: no station raises an exception, no gate sends the unit back, no rework loop fires and nothing sits in a queue between stations.

The second clock is the allowance.

A decision may be handed to the agent lane only if two things hold …

The run reads the station rows only.

What this run does not model: arrival patterns, contention between procedures for the same person, shift patterns, weekends, learning curves, and the cost of anything.

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit, the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 11.1 days

now Frame · Idea Intake Agent · 40 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 3 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 11.3 days

now Frame · Idea Intake Agent · 40 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

3 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Roles and responsibilities

6 named parties

The responsibility grid is assigned by a rule, not lifted from a chart.

PartyRACIStepsDutyEscalates to

Innovation Portfolio Orchestrator

orchestrator

Runs the line0Sequences this line, holds its timetable and decides what has to surface to a person. Raises to VP Innovation when a unit falls outside the envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Idea Intake Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

91% clean · 6% overridden

Responsible1Executes the continuous improvement step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Continuous Improvement when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Stage Gate Agent

agent

A2% autonomy · ceiling A2%

97% clean · 5% overridden

Responsible1Executes the innovation portfolio step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to VP Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Portfolio Balance Agent

agent

A2% autonomy · ceiling A2%

91% clean · 2% overridden

Responsible1Executes the innovation portfolio step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to VP Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Resource Allocation Agent

agent

A2% autonomy · ceiling A2%

91% clean · 2% overridden

Responsible1Executes the innovation portfolio step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to VP Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

VP Innovation

person

Accountable and responsible1Holds 1 decision on this line. Accountable to VP Innovation for the decisions held here.

Decision points and escalation

1 places this procedure stops

05 · ExCo ratify

4.4 days

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the program decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

VP Innovation

Handoffs out of this procedure

Nothing leaves this procedure for another function. It completes inside Innovation Portfolio.

The rules this procedure runs inside

2 governing rules

Innovation Portfolio Decision Envelope

superseded

RD2-POL-200 · envelope · vv5.1

Agents in this lane may act without a human when the program sits inside the stated value, risk and confidence envelope.

Approved by VP Innovation · in force 2026-02-08 · reviewed 2026-05-18

Binds Idea Intake Agent, Stage Gate Agent, Portfolio Balance Agent, Resource Allocation Agent

EU · UK

Innovation Portfolio Evidence Standard

active

RD2-POL-201 · evidence · vv2.2

Every autonomous decision writes inputs, the rule version applied, the model and prompt version, the output and a reversal path.

Approved by VP Innovation · in force 2025-11-10 · reviewed 2026-04-29

Binds Idea Intake Agent, Stage Gate Agent, Portfolio Balance Agent, Resource Allocation Agent

US · Canada

Systems this procedure touches

1 named · 0 connected

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

SystemVendorDomainCriticalityStepsConnection
Product Lifecycle ManagementSiemens Teamcenterengineeringhigh5modeled

0 of the 1 systems on this procedure is connected to the platform, and none of the twenty-six in the estate register is. 0 of them are marked as taking a write back, which is a property of the system, not a live path from here.

How it performs

End to end

11.1 days

Summed from the time each step sits, standard 17.6 days — running at 63% of the standard.

Touchless

28%

Agent share

80%

A week

5

In flight

157

Effort a week

6,397 human minutes · 9,567 agent minutes

Volume multiplied by the time on each step.

Assurance over this procedure

4 governance gates sit above it

The twenty-four controls and eighteen exception classes in this platform are held at estate level …

GateWhat trips itWho releases itClockWaivable

Physical experiment authorization

approval

Any laboratory experiment involving materials, equipment or subjectsPrincipal investigator and safety officer2 business daysNo

External data acquisition

approval

Any new external dataset, license or third-party evidence sourceResearch governance and Legal3 business daysNo

Publication or external disclosure

approval

Any material leaving the research boundary, including conference abstractsCSO and General Counsel5 business daysNo

Reproduction sampling

oversight

Independent re-derivation of 15% of reported internal resultsReproducibility boardMonthlyNo

What this document is and is not

These procedures describe the modeled estate.

Actions

What is waiting on a person

What one procedure document gives you, and what to check before you treat it as the standard.

Operations

What this desk is allowed to start

A surface that only reports is not operable.

Trigger and bound

A procedure document prints purpose, scope, entry and exit, the numbered steps with the actor on each, the roles and their RACI position, the swimlane, the decision points and escalation, the handoffs, the governing rules with version and approver, the systems by rule and the timings.

Live observability

What the record shows right now

The whole library, by lane, so a single document can be read against the estate it came from.

Current distribution

2,748 steps

Agent, inside the function1,38951%
Agent, on the shared spine85131%
Person deciding at a gate50818%

Is policy and strategy coming to fruition

Whether the written intent is holding here

Half. The document is complete and every actor on it is measured

Not holding on the record

A procedure here carries a version, an approver, an in-force date and a last-review date.