LensReading which lens this session carries.

Standard operating procedure · GB9D · AI GBS & Global Business Services

Service Delivery Model Position

Judgment procedure owned by Service Delivery Management in AI GBS & Global Business Services. 6 numbered steps, 1 of them a person deciding and 5 of them agent work …

Procedure code

GB9D

Judgment

Rule versions in force

v4.1 · v1.2 · v2.3

3 governing rules stacked over it

In force since

2024-11-14

Earliest effective date across those rules

Last reviewed

2026-08-04

Latest review date across those rules

Rules approved by

1

Head of Service Delivery

Rule health

3/3

0 under review · 0 superseded

There is no document register behind this header. The version, the dates and the approver names are read off the governing rules this procedure runs inside, which is the closest thing the estate holds to a document control record. Nobody wrote these procedures. There is no document library behind this page and no Word file anywhere in the estate. Every procedure below is generated from rows this platform already holds: the line and its ordered stations, the owning team and the person accountable for it, the policy items bound to that team, and the governance gates seeded against the function. The steps, the owners, the gates, the approvers, the dwell times and the volumes are read straight off those rows. The sentences that join them together are generated. Read a procedure as the estate describing itself, not as a document somebody signed.

Purpose and scope

What this procedure is for and where it stops

To run service delivery model position to one repeatable standard inside Service Delivery Management, part of AI GBS & Global Business Services.

Entry condition

Runs judgment. Starts when a leadership team frames the question.

Exit condition

The unit clears ratify, released by Head of Service Delivery.

In scope

  • Every unit of service delivery model position raised inside Service Delivery Management, from the trigger below through to the final step.
  • 5 of the 6 steps, which run without a person present.
  • 1 decision that stops the line until a named person releases it.

Out of scope

  • Anything outside the envelope set by the owning team. It leaves the line at a gate and becomes the named approver's decision.
  • Work that belongs to another function. This line records no handoff, so nothing leaves it mid-flow.
  • Shared-spine work. This line has none; every step is done inside the function.

Who owns it

Runs the line

Service Delivery Orchestrator

Accountable person

Head of Service Delivery

The end of the escalation path. Above them sits GBS Chief of Staff for the function.

That team’s remit

Owns service review work end to end inside AI GBS & Global Business Services.

That remit describes the whole team, not this one procedure, so its counts are larger than the ones on this page.

Autonomy

66% now · ceiling 74%

Monitoring and rebalancing are agentic.

The procedure, step by step

6 numbered steps · 1 of them stop for a person

A step is one station on the line.

No.StepWho does itWhat happensSystem of recordTime on the stepIn flight
01

Frame question

Agentstrategy

SLA Monitoring Agent

SLA Monitoring Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse41.0 hrsstandard 3.0 days2
02

Gather evidence

Agentstrategy

Capacity Balancing Agent

Capacity Balancing Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse2.7 daysstandard 4.2 days27
03

Model options

Agentstrategy

Escalation Management Agent

Escalation Management Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse45.7 hrsstandard 2.7 days1
04

Draft position

Agentstrategy

Stakeholder Reporting Agent

Stakeholder Reporting Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse2.6 daysstandard 5.1 days13
05

Challenge

Agentstrategy

Incident Coordination Agent

Incident Coordination Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse2.9 daysstandard 6.2 days35
06

Ratify

HumanpolicyDecision

Head of Service Delivery

Releases: Head of Service Delivery

Work stops. Head of Service Delivery reviews what the line has produced and either releases the unit or sends it back. Nothing downstream of this step runs until that decision is made.Holds until: Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.Group ERP — Financials3.9 daysstandard 7.6 days9

The swimlane

The same steps, laid out by who is holding the work

Three lanes: a person deciding, an agent working, and the shared services spine.

Person1 station and 25% of the dwellAgent5 stations and 75% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell1 crossing between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Group ERP — Financials
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Run the procedure

One unit walked along that swimlane on the happy viable agentified path

Press run and a single unit enters at station 01. Each station takes exactly the dwell this platform records for it and is held by whoever the estate says holds it.

speed
worked clock
00:00
allowance clock
00:00
stations cleared
0/6
the happy path, worked time0 min of 15.8 days
the same run against its allowance0 min of 28.7 days
Human
decides · 1
Agent
does the work · 5
GBS
shared spine · 0
run log

Nothing has happened yet.

where the worked time goes15.8 days a unit
Person3.9 days · 25%Agent11.8 days · 75%1 crossing between lanes
what makes this path viable
  • The lanes are the recorded lanes. 1 of the 6 stations stop for a person and every one of them still does on this run.
  • Every one of the 1 decision is still taken by the person who holds it. The happy path is that each one is released first time, not that it is skipped.
  • The owning team is held to a 74% autonomy ceiling and this run sits at 75% unattended, inside it.
  • 2 systems are attributed across the stations, and 0 of them are connected. Nothing in this run has been watched executing against a real system of record.
what would have to change

One decision, held by Head of Service Delivery.

stays with a person
  • 06 Ratify — The last decision on the line. Something on every procedure ends with a person, so this one is never offered.
what this run is, and what it is not

This is a run, not a forecast.

Happy means nothing goes wrong: no station raises an exception, no gate sends the unit back, no rework loop fires and nothing sits in a queue between stations.

The second clock is the allowance.

A decision may be handed to the agent lane only if two things hold …

The run reads the station rows only.

What this run does not model: arrival patterns, contention between procedures for the same person, shift patterns, weekends, learning curves, and the cost of anything.

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit, the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

6 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 15.8 days

now Frame question · SLA Monitoring Agent · 41 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 3 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 16.0 days

now Frame question · SLA Monitoring Agent · 41 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

3 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Roles and responsibilities

7 named parties

The responsibility grid is assigned by a rule, not lifted from a chart.

PartyRACIStepsDutyEscalates to

Service Delivery Orchestrator

orchestrator

Runs the line0Sequences this line, holds its timetable and decides what has to surface to a person. Raises to Head of Service Delivery when a unit falls outside the envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

SLA Monitoring Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

91% clean · 11% overridden

Responsible1Watches service delivery management continuously. Escalates to Head of Service Delivery when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Capacity Balancing Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

97% clean · 6% overridden

Responsible1Runs the repeatable portion of supply planning inside the shared transaction spine at spine cost and spine controls.Escalates to Director, Supply Planning when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Escalation Management Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

93% clean · 5% overridden

Responsible1Executes the service delivery management step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Service Delivery when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Stakeholder Reporting Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

90% clean · 9% overridden

Responsible1Runs the repeatable portion of service delivery management inside the shared transaction spine at spine cost and spine controls.Escalates to Head of Service Delivery when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Incident Coordination Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

98% clean · 8% overridden

Responsible1Executes the service delivery management step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Service Delivery when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Head of Service Delivery

person

Accountable and responsible1Holds 1 decision on this line. Accountable to Head of Service Delivery for the decisions held here.

Decision points and escalation

1 places this procedure stops

06 · Ratify

3.9 days

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

Head of Service Delivery

Handoffs out of this procedure

Nothing leaves this procedure for another function. It completes inside Service Delivery Management.

The rules this procedure runs inside

3 governing rules

Service Delivery Management Decision Envelope

active

GB9-POL-200 · envelope · vv4.1

Agents in this lane may act without a human when the service review sits inside the stated value, risk and confidence envelope.

Approved by Head of Service Delivery · in force 2025-01-15 · reviewed 2026-06-02

Binds Capacity Balancing Agent, Escalation Management Agent, Stakeholder Reporting Agent, Incident Coordination Agent

US · Canada

Service Delivery Management Evidence Standard

active

GB9-POL-201 · evidence · vv1.2

Every autonomous decision writes inputs, the rule version applied, the model and prompt version, the output and a reversal path.

Approved by Head of Service Delivery · in force 2024-11-14 · reviewed 2026-08-04

Binds Capacity Balancing Agent, Escalation Management Agent, Stakeholder Reporting Agent, Incident Coordination Agent

EU · UK · US

Service Delivery Management Escalation Rule

active

GB9-POL-202 · escalation · vv2.3

Escalation is mandatory when confidence falls below the floor, when two options sit inside the confidence band, or when a break condition on a ratified position fires.

Approved by Head of Service Delivery · in force 2026-05-12 · reviewed 2026-06-23

Binds Capacity Balancing Agent, Escalation Management Agent, Stakeholder Reporting Agent, Incident Coordination Agent

EU · UK

Systems this procedure touches

2 named · 0 connected

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

SystemVendorDomainCriticalityStepsConnection
Enterprise Data WarehouseSnowflakeanalyticscritical5modeled
Group ERP — FinancialsSAP S/4HANAledgercritical1modeled

0 of the 2 systems on this procedure is connected to the platform, and none of the twenty-six in the estate register is. 1 of them are marked as taking a write back, which is a property of the system, not a live path from here.

How it performs

End to end

15.8 days

Summed from the time each step sits, standard 28.7 days — running at 55% of the standard.

Touchless

35%

Agent share

83%

A week

2

In flight

87

Effort a week

5,682 human minutes · 17,009 agent minutes

Volume multiplied by the time on each step.

Assurance over this procedure

4 governance gates sit above it

The twenty-four controls and eighteen exception classes in this platform are held at estate level …

GateWhat trips itWho releases itClockWaivable

Autonomy level increase

approval

Any move of an agent or workflow to a higher autonomy bandBusiness owner and risk5 business daysNo

New data class processing

approval

Any service processing a data class not already approvedRisk and privacy officer5 business daysNo

Outsourcing or service removal

approval

Any material operating-model, sourcing or service-portfolio changeGBS executive committee10 business daysNo

Agent recertification

oversight

Quarterly evaluation of every agent against its published certification criteriaAgent governance boardQuarterlyNo

What this document is and is not

These procedures describe the modeled estate.

Actions

What is waiting on a person

What one procedure document gives you, and what to check before you treat it as the standard.

Operations

What this desk is allowed to start

A surface that only reports is not operable.

Trigger and bound

A procedure document prints purpose, scope, entry and exit, the numbered steps with the actor on each, the roles and their RACI position, the swimlane, the decision points and escalation, the handoffs, the governing rules with version and approver, the systems by rule and the timings.

Live observability

What the record shows right now

The whole library, by lane, so a single document can be read against the estate it came from.

Current distribution

2,748 steps

Agent, inside the function1,38951%
Agent, on the shared spine85131%
Person deciding at a gate50818%

Is policy and strategy coming to fruition

Whether the written intent is holding here

Half. The document is complete and every actor on it is measured

Not holding on the record

A procedure here carries a version, an approver, an in-force date and a last-review date.