LensReading which lens this session carries.

Standard operating procedure · GB11C · AI GBS & Global Business Services

Automation Economics Position

Judgment procedure owned by Cost-to-Serve Management in AI GBS & Global Business Services. 7 numbered steps, 1 of them a person deciding and 6 of them agent work …

Procedure code

GB11C

Judgment

Rule versions in force

v1.9 · v2.6

3 governing rules stacked over it

In force since

2025-04-20

Earliest effective date across those rules

Last reviewed

2026-08-10

Latest review date across those rules

Rules approved by

1

Head of Service Economics

Rule health

3/3

0 under review · 0 superseded

There is no document register behind this header. The version, the dates and the approver names are read off the governing rules this procedure runs inside, which is the closest thing the estate holds to a document control record. Nobody wrote these procedures. There is no document library behind this page and no Word file anywhere in the estate. Every procedure below is generated from rows this platform already holds: the line and its ordered stations, the owning team and the person accountable for it, the policy items bound to that team, and the governance gates seeded against the function. The steps, the owners, the gates, the approvers, the dwell times and the volumes are read straight off those rows. The sentences that join them together are generated. Read a procedure as the estate describing itself, not as a document somebody signed.

Purpose and scope

What this procedure is for and where it stops

To run automation economics position to one repeatable standard inside Cost-to-Serve Management, part of AI GBS & Global Business Services.

Entry condition

Runs judgment. Starts when a break condition on a live position fires.

Exit condition

The unit clears ratify, released by Head of Service Economics.

In scope

  • Every unit of automation economics position raised inside Cost-to-Serve Management, from the trigger below through to the final step.
  • 6 of the 7 steps, which run without a person present.
  • 1 decision that stops the line until a named person releases it.

Out of scope

  • Anything outside the envelope set by the owning team. It leaves the line at a gate and becomes the named approver's decision.
  • Work that belongs to another function. This line records no handoff, so nothing leaves it mid-flow.
  • Shared-spine work. This line has none; every step is done inside the function.

Who owns it

Runs the line

Cost-to-Serve Orchestrator

Accountable person

Head of Service Economics

The end of the escalation path. Above them sits GBS Chief of Staff for the function.

That team’s remit

Owns cost line work end to end inside AI GBS & Global Business Services.

That remit describes the whole team, not this one procedure, so its counts are larger than the ones on this page.

Autonomy

84% now · ceiling 85%

The tower that keeps the platform honest.

The procedure, step by step

7 numbered steps · 1 of them stop for a person

A step is one station on the line.

No.StepWho does itWhat happensSystem of recordTime on the stepIn flight
01

Frame question

Agentstrategy

Unit Cost Agent

Unit Cost Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse2.6 daysstandard 2.9 days27
02

Gather evidence

Agentstrategy

Inference Cost Agent

Inference Cost Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse30.6 hrsstandard 2.8 days28
03

Model options

Agentstrategy

Volume Attribution Agent

Volume Attribution Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse37.7 hrsstandard 2.7 days3
04

Draft position

Agentstrategy

Chargeback Agent

Chargeback Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse17.9 hrsstandard 42.1 hrs39
05

Challenge

Agentstrategy

Benchmark Agent

Benchmark Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse32.5 hrsstandard 3.2 days31
06

Revise

Agentstrategy

Margin of Automation Agent

Margin of Automation Agent performs this step unattended at the strategy layer, inside the envelope its owning team has set, and writes an evidence record naming the actor, the authority it acted under and the digests of what it read and wrote.Enterprise Data Warehouse34.3 hrsstandard 2.6 days32
07

Ratify

HumanpolicyDecision

Head of Service Economics

Releases: Head of Service Economics

Work stops. Head of Service Economics reviews what the line has produced and either releases the unit or sends it back. Nothing downstream of this step runs until that decision is made.Holds until: Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.Group ERP — Financials2.4 daysstandard 5.5 days4

The swimlane

The same steps, laid out by who is holding the work

Three lanes: a person deciding, an agent working, and the shared services spine.

Person1 station and 21% of the dwellAgent6 stations and 79% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell1 crossing between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Group ERP — Financials
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Run the procedure

One unit walked along that swimlane on the happy viable agentified path

Press run and a single unit enters at station 01. Each station takes exactly the dwell this platform records for it and is held by whoever the estate says holds it.

speed
worked clock
00:00
allowance clock
00:00
stations cleared
0/7
the happy path, worked time0 min of 11.3 days
the same run against its allowance0 min of 21.5 days
Human
decides · 1
Agent
does the work · 6
GBS
shared spine · 0
run log

Nothing has happened yet.

where the worked time goes11.3 days a unit
Person2.4 days · 21%Agent8.9 days · 79%1 crossing between lanes
what makes this path viable
  • The lanes are the recorded lanes. 1 of the 7 stations stop for a person and every one of them still does on this run.
  • Every one of the 1 decision is still taken by the person who holds it. The happy path is that each one is released first time, not that it is skipped.
  • The owning team is held to a 85% autonomy ceiling and this run sits at 79% unattended, inside it.
  • 2 systems are attributed across the stations, and 0 of them are connected. Nothing in this run has been watched executing against a real system of record.
what would have to change

One decision, held by Head of Service Economics.

stays with a person
  • 07 Ratify — The last decision on the line. Something on every procedure ends with a person, so this one is never offered.
what this run is, and what it is not

This is a run, not a forecast.

Happy means nothing goes wrong: no station raises an exception, no gate sends the unit back, no rework loop fires and nothing sits in a queue between stations.

The second clock is the allowance.

A decision may be handed to the agent lane only if two things hold …

The run reads the station rows only.

What this run does not model: arrival patterns, contention between procedures for the same person, shift patterns, weekends, learning curves, and the cost of anything.

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit, the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

7 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 11.3 days

now Frame question · Unit Cost Agent · 2.6 days

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 2 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 11.4 days

now Frame question · Unit Cost Agent · 2.6 days

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

2 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Roles and responsibilities

8 named parties

The responsibility grid is assigned by a rule, not lifted from a chart.

PartyRACIStepsDutyEscalates to

Cost-to-Serve Orchestrator

orchestrator

Runs the line0Sequences this line, holds its timetable and decides what has to surface to a person. Raises to Head of Service Economics when a unit falls outside the envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Unit Cost Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

94% clean · 8% overridden

Responsible1Runs the repeatable portion of cost-to-serve management inside the shared transaction spine at spine cost and spine controls.Escalates to Head of Service Economics when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Inference Cost Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

93% clean · 5% overridden

Responsible1Executes the cost-to-serve management step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Service Economics when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Volume Attribution Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

97% clean · 8% overridden

Responsible1Executes the cost-to-serve management step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Service Economics when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Chargeback Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

88% clean · 1% overridden

Responsible1Runs the repeatable portion of cost-to-serve management inside the shared transaction spine at spine cost and spine controls.Escalates to Head of Service Economics when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Benchmark Agent

agent

A3% autonomy · ceiling A3%

89% clean · 4% overridden

Responsible1Executes the cost-to-serve management step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.Escalates to Head of Service Economics when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Margin of Automation Agent

agent

A2% autonomy · ceiling A3%

95% clean · 11% overridden

Responsible1Authors positions on cost-to-serve management. Escalates when two options sit inside the confidence band and the evidence cannot separate them.

Head of Service Economics

person

Accountable and responsible1Holds 1 decision on this line. Accountable to Head of Service Economics for the decisions held here.

Decision points and escalation

1 places this procedure stops

07 · Ratify

2.4 days

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

Head of Service Economics

Handoffs out of this procedure

Nothing leaves this procedure for another function. It completes inside Cost-to-Serve Management.

The rules this procedure runs inside

3 governing rules

Cost-to-Serve Management Decision Envelope

active

GB11-POL-200 · envelope · vv1.9

Agents in this lane may act without a human when the cost line sits inside the stated value, risk and confidence envelope.

Approved by Head of Service Economics · in force 2025-04-20 · reviewed 2026-05-01

Binds Unit Cost Agent, Inference Cost Agent, Volume Attribution Agent, Chargeback Agent, Benchmark Agent, Cost Narrative Agent

EU · UK

Cost-to-Serve Management Evidence Standard

active

GB11-POL-201 · evidence · vv2.6

Every autonomous decision writes inputs, the rule version applied, the model and prompt version, the output and a reversal path.

Approved by Head of Service Economics · in force 2025-05-16 · reviewed 2026-04-19

Binds Unit Cost Agent, Inference Cost Agent, Volume Attribution Agent, Chargeback Agent, Benchmark Agent, Cost Narrative Agent

APAC

Cost-to-Serve Management Escalation Rule

active

GB11-POL-202 · escalation · vv1.9

Escalation is mandatory when confidence falls below the floor, when two options sit inside the confidence band, or when a break condition on a ratified position fires.

Approved by Head of Service Economics · in force 2025-06-04 · reviewed 2026-08-10

Binds Unit Cost Agent, Inference Cost Agent, Volume Attribution Agent, Chargeback Agent, Benchmark Agent, Cost Narrative Agent

APAC

Systems this procedure touches

2 named · 0 connected

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

SystemVendorDomainCriticalityStepsConnection
Enterprise Data WarehouseSnowflakeanalyticscritical6modeled
Group ERP — FinancialsSAP S/4HANAledgercritical1modeled

0 of the 2 systems on this procedure is connected to the platform, and none of the twenty-six in the estate register is. 1 of them are marked as taking a write back, which is a property of the system, not a live path from here.

How it performs

End to end

11.3 days

Summed from the time each step sits, standard 21.5 days — running at 53% of the standard.

Touchless

52%

Agent share

86%

A week

2

In flight

164

Effort a week

3,471 human minutes · 12,854 agent minutes

Volume multiplied by the time on each step.

Assurance over this procedure

4 governance gates sit above it

The twenty-four controls and eighteen exception classes in this platform are held at estate level …

GateWhat trips itWho releases itClockWaivable

Autonomy level increase

approval

Any move of an agent or workflow to a higher autonomy bandBusiness owner and risk5 business daysNo

New data class processing

approval

Any service processing a data class not already approvedRisk and privacy officer5 business daysNo

Outsourcing or service removal

approval

Any material operating-model, sourcing or service-portfolio changeGBS executive committee10 business daysNo

Agent recertification

oversight

Quarterly evaluation of every agent against its published certification criteriaAgent governance boardQuarterlyNo

What this document is and is not

These procedures describe the modeled estate.

Actions

What is waiting on a person

What one procedure document gives you, and what to check before you treat it as the standard.

Operations

What this desk is allowed to start

A surface that only reports is not operable.

Trigger and bound

A procedure document prints purpose, scope, entry and exit, the numbered steps with the actor on each, the roles and their RACI position, the swimlane, the decision points and escalation, the handoffs, the governing rules with version and approver, the systems by rule and the timings.

Live observability

What the record shows right now

The whole library, by lane, so a single document can be read against the estate it came from.

Current distribution

2,748 steps

Agent, inside the function1,38951%
Agent, on the shared spine85131%
Person deciding at a gate50818%

Is policy and strategy coming to fruition

Whether the written intent is holding here

Half. The document is complete and every actor on it is measured

Not holding on the record

A procedure here carries a version, an approver, an in-force date and a last-review date.