LensReading which lens this session carries.

Service level · Tower to function

Source-to-Pay touchless rate

Source-to-Pay Tower

All service levels

The commitment

Who owes what to whom

TypeCommitted level
Owed byAI GBS — Source-to-Pay Tower
Owed toProcurement
Measurement windowCalendar month
Effective fromFeb 19, 2026
Next reviewOct 29, 2026

Signature

Named and dated

Signed byRafael Ortiz
RoleGeneral Counsel
Signed onFeb 11, 2026
A signature makes this level a commitment somebody can be held to.

How it is measured

From the work ledger

Units closed with zero human touches against units closed.
source erp-fin

What a miss costs

Fee at risk

Three percent of the quarterly tower fee is at risk against this level.
3% of quarterly fee at risk, assessed at quarter end.

Attainment by period

6 measured periods · floor at 95%

2025 Q4
98.1%
91.0% · target met
2026 Q1
98.2%
91.1% · target met
2026 Q2
93.4%
84.3% · target missed
Jun 2026
95.9%
87.9% · target missed
Jul 2026
99.3%
92.7% · target met
Aug 2026
100.0%
93.6% · target met
The bar scale starts at 85% rather than zero, because every value on a service level sits in the last few points and a zero-based axis would flatten the only part of the range anyone argues about.

Breach history

1 recorded miss

BRC-00072026 Q2 · occurred Jun 17, 2026 · detected 2 months ago
measured 84.3 against 88.0
missed by 4.2%
337 units affected
open 32.7 hrs
A supplier master update introduced duplicate records.
contributing: Detection lag of 11 hours before anyone was paged · Measured from the work unit ledger
Intake data qualityCredit paid · $5.4kClosed
Morgan Idris, Function Leader, Revenue Growth Management · remediation due Aug 1, 2026 · closed
Instrument the path independently rather than accepting the tower dashboard as the measurement of record.
What this record is, and what it is not

Drill results are measured against a modeled estate on a rehearsal calendar of our own making.

Attainment, breach detail and credit on this record are modeled.