Service level · Tower to function
Record-to-Report reconciliation completeness
Record-to-Report Tower
Committed level
99%
accuracy at or above target · per close
Attainment
97.8%
worst period 96.2%
Consequence of a miss
No consequence
Reported and discussed. Nothing changes hands.
Breaches
0
0 with remediation still open
Credit
$0
$0 of it actually paid
The commitment
Who owes what to whom
TypeOperational level
Owed byAI GBS — Record-to-Report Tower
Owed toFinance
Measurement windowPer close
Effective fromApr 20, 2026
Next reviewAug 7, 2026 — overdue
Signature
Nobody has signed this
This level has no signature on file. It is published, it is measured against, and it appears in reporting — but no named person on either side has agreed to it. It is shown here as unsigned rather than being quietly presented as agreed.
How it is measured
From the work ledger
Reconciliation sets tied against sets in scope, from the Wave 5 reconciliation ledger.
source erp-fin
What a miss costs
No consequence
No clause. The reconciliation ledger already shows unowned breaks, and no consequence was ever attached to leaving them unowned.
None.
There is no credit, no fee at risk and no other consequence attached to this level. A miss produces a report and a conversation. That is stated plainly here because a service level with no consequence behaves like a target, and calling it a commitment does not change how it behaves under pressure.
Attainment by period
6 measured periods · floor at 95%
2025 Q4
98.2%
102.5% · target met
2026 Q1
97.9%
102.0% · target met
2026 Q2
100.0%
105.3% · target met
Jun 2026
96.2%
99.3% · target met
Jul 2026
96.5%
99.8% · target met
Aug 2026
98.1%
102.3% · target met
The bar scale starts at 85% rather than zero, because every value on a service level sits in the last few points and a zero-based axis would flatten the only part of the range anyone argues about. The floor line is attainment below 95%, which is what opens a breach.
Breach history
No breaches recorded
No period has fallen below the attainment floor on this level in the measured window. That is a clean record over a short window on a modeled estate, not a track record.
What this record is, and what it is not
Drill results are measured against a modeled estate on a rehearsal calendar of our own making. Recovery times here are real measurements of a simulation, not evidence that a customer's production estate recovers in the same time.
Attainment, breach detail and credit on this record are modeled. The structure — a named counterparty, a measurement basis that can be checked, a signature, a review date, a consequence, and a breach ledger that records the cause rather than the excuse — is the part intended to survive contact with a real estate.