LensReading which lens this session carries.

Service level · Tower to function

Order-to-Cash lane availability

Order-to-Cash Tower

All service levels
Committed level
99.5%
availability at or above target · calendar month
Attainment
97.5%
worst period 95.8%
Consequence of a miss
Service credit
capped at 20%
Breaches
0
0 with remediation still open
Credit
$0
$0 of it actually paid

The commitment

Who owes what to whom

TypeCommitted level
Owed byAI GBS — Order-to-Cash Tower
Owed toSales, Customer Service
Measurement windowCalendar month
Effective fromMar 21, 2026
Next reviewSep 17, 2026

Signature

Named and dated

Signed byMorgan Idris
RoleFunction Leader, Revenue Operations
Signed onMar 15, 2026
A signature makes this level a commitment somebody can be held to. Without one it is a target that reads like a commitment.

How it is measured

Asserted, not measured

Reported by the tower from its own operations dashboard. There is no independent probe, so this figure is asserted rather than measured.
no source system named
Attainment for this level does not come from the work ledger. It is reported by the provider or sampled by hand, which means the number cannot be independently reconstructed from evidence held on this estate.

What a miss costs

Service credit

Below 99.5% returns 2% of the monthly charge; below 98% returns 8%.
Tiered: 2% below 99.5%, 8% below 98%.

Attainment by period

6 measured periods · floor at 95%

2025 Q4
98.1%
102.8% · target met
2026 Q1
96.3%
100.0% · target met
2026 Q2
95.8%
99.2% · target missed
Jun 2026
99.1%
104.4% · target met
Jul 2026
98.3%
103.2% · target met
Aug 2026
97.6%
102.0% · target met
The bar scale starts at 85% rather than zero, because every value on a service level sits in the last few points and a zero-based axis would flatten the only part of the range anyone argues about. The floor line is attainment below 95%, which is what opens a breach.

Breach history

No breaches recorded

No period has fallen below the attainment floor on this level in the measured window. That is a clean record over a short window on a modeled estate, not a track record.
What this record is, and what it is not

Drill results are measured against a modeled estate on a rehearsal calendar of our own making. Recovery times here are real measurements of a simulation, not evidence that a customer's production estate recovers in the same time.

Attainment, breach detail and credit on this record are modeled. The structure — a named counterparty, a measurement basis that can be checked, a signature, a review date, a consequence, and a breach ledger that records the cause rather than the excuse — is the part intended to survive contact with a real estate.