End-to-end outcomes · Req to receipt
Requisition to receipt
The buying half of the supplier relationship. A person asks for something, the group commits to buy it, and somebody confirms it arrived. Nothing downstream can be paid correctly until this chain closes.
Health
What the chain measures
Cycle time, wait and cost are computed on complete chains only. Everything else is computed on every assembled chain and says so.
The chain, stage by stage
3 stages · the wait column is the gap before that stage began, measured on the chains that reached it
| Stage | Document | Function | Tower | System | Reached | Wait before | Stage cycle | Confidence | Joined by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Requisition raised | purchase-req | Procurement | S2P | s2p-suite | 360 · 100% | — | 4.0 h | — | Origin 360 |
| 2Order placedvalue | purchase-order | Procurement | S2P | erp-mm | 189 · 53% | 22.9 h | 2.4 h | 0.77 | Inferred 189 |
| 3Receipt posted | goods-receipt | Supply Chain | S2P | erp-mm | 96 · 27% | 34.2 h | 6.9 h | 1.00 | Keyed 96 |
The requisition is raised in the sourcing suite. The order and the receipt are both created in materials management and are held together by the order number. Nothing carries out of the sourcing suite, but the supplier is named on both sides of that step, so the join has something real to work with.
The distribution, not the average
Cycle time across the 96 complete chains, in ten equal bands
Fastest 26.8 h, slowest 6.6 d, median 2.9 d, mean 2.9 d. The mean sits at or below the median, so quoting the average alone would understate what a typical chain of this service takes.
What the chain costs and carries
Cost is modeled from recorded touches. Value is the amount on the designated value stage only.
The commitment against this outcome
Requisition to receipt inside 4 days · owned by Diego Fuentes
Measured on the 193 chains that started early enough for the whole 96 hour commitment to fall inside the extract. Chains that started later are left out, because they could not have been seen to miss. Inside that set a chain still running past the commitment counts as a miss, not as pending.
This commitment sits alongside the function level service levels the estate already publishes, not instead of them. Every function inside this chain can hold its own commitment while this one misses.
The handoffs this service crosses
Mapped to the Source to Settle cross-flow · 4 handoffs
| Boundary | Mean wait | Rework | Typed in twice | Weekly cost | Owner | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement → Supply Chain | 34.1 h | 4% | 13% | $164k | Diego Fuentes | Measured |
| Supply Chain → Financegate | 34.8 h | 15% | 13% | $141k | Nobody | Modeled |
| Finance → AI GBS | 21.1 h | 7% | 12% | $49k | Sofia Kalogeropoulou | Modeled |
| AI GBS → The supplier | 32.9 h | 9% | 64% | $127k | Nobody | Modeled |
Who owns the delay
1 boundary disputes touch this service · 1 undecided
Requisitions close when the order is placed. Orders close when the goods arrive. Neither closes on a receipt that is never entered, and the invoice that follows cannot be matched. Procurement and the sites disagree about whose queue that sits in.
Trace one chain end to end
The 14 complete chains carrying the largest amounts. Open one to see every document, the wait before each stage and the moments a person intervened.
| Chain | Counterparty | Market | Cycle | Waiting | Cost | People | Joined by | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OI-RTR-0137 | Cressida Systems | Germany | 2.9 d | 2.6 d | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.86 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0269 | Coalridge Systems | India | 3.6 d | 2.4 d | $47.09 | 1 | Mixed 0.64 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0125 | Stanhope Cartons | Mexico | 2.4 d | 2.0 d | $15.19 | 1 | Mixed 0.86 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0194 | Ostwald Freight | Argentina | 46.6 h | 43.2 h | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0227 | Rothsay Industries | Chile | 2.5 d | 2.2 d | $15.19 | 1 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0033 | Whitmore Chemicals | Italy | 3.6 d | 3.2 d | $25.83 | 1 | Mixed 0.88 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0161 | Calderon Production Services | Italy | 4.3 d | 3.7 d | $25.83 | 1 | Mixed 0.64 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0008 | Kirchner Energy | Brazil | 2.0 d | 25.9 h | $57.73 | 2 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0155 | Calderon Agency Group | Canada | 3.2 d | 2.0 d | $78.99 | 2 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0172 | Barenholt Technology | India | 2.6 d | 2.4 d | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.92 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0024 | Northmoor Containers | Netherlands | 2.5 d | 2.3 d | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0050 | Ostwald Logistics | Netherlands | 44.5 h | 40.1 h | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.76 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0029 | Calderon Packaging | France | 3.2 d | 2.5 d | $57.73 | 1 | Mixed 0.64 | Trace |
| OI-RTR-0097 | Lindqvist Containers | India | 3.7 d | 3.4 d | $4.56 | 0 | Mixed 0.86 | Trace |
A receipt that never posts is the single largest cause of an invoice that cannot be matched, so the cost of a broken requisition chain is paid twice: once here in chasing, and again in the payment tower as an exception.
An outcome is assembled, not recorded. No source system in this estate stamps a single reference across a purchase requisition, the order raised against it and the receipt that closes it, so the chains on these pages were stitched together after the fact. Where both documents sit in the same source system the chain is keyed and the join is exact. Where it crosses a system boundary the chain is matched on the party, the market, the region and whether the timing is plausible, and it is labeled inferred with its confidence shown. Where the two sides name no party in common the only evidence left is place and timing, and the chain is labeled cohort and confidence is capped low on purpose. A cohort chain is a hypothesis about which documents belong together. Read it as one.
The ledger behind these chains is one week, 10 to 16 August 2026, which is 168 hours. A chain that had not finished when the week ended is open, not late: the week simply stopped watching it. A chain whose commitment falls after the end of the week could never have been seen to miss, so its service level reads not measurable rather than holding. Nothing on these pages should be read as a monthly or annual attainment.
Cost to serve is modeled from the touches the ledger recorded, not billed from a timesheet. Every touch is priced at 11 minutes of a person at a loaded 58 dollars an hour, and every stage carries 1.10 dollars of system cost and 0.42 dollars of inference. Handoff cost is priced separately: waiting is held at 0.90 dollars an item an hour, rework at 34 minutes, and duplicated data entry at the re-keying minutes recorded against that handoff. Change any of those six rates and every dollar on these pages moves.