LensReading which lens this session carries.

End-to-end outcomes · Req to receipt

Requisition to receipt

The buying half of the supplier relationship. A person asks for something, the group commits to buy it, and somebody confirms it arrived. Nothing downstream can be paid correctly until this chain closes.

All outcomes
Starts when
A requisition is raised against a cost center
Ends when
The goods or service is receipted against the order
Accountable for the whole chain
Diego Fuentes
Head of source to pay · Procurement & Source-to-Pay
Crosses
ProcurementSupply ChainS2P

Health

What the chain measures

Cycle time, wait and cost are computed on complete chains only. Everything else is computed on every assembled chain and says so.

Chains assembled
360
3 stages · 0 crossed more than one tower
Complete end to end
26.7%
96 chains found every stage
Median cycle
2.9 d
p25 2.3 d · p75 3.4 d · p90 3.9 d
Waiting
82%
2.4 d waiting against 12.9 h of work
Cost to serve
$19.29
$1,852 across the complete chains · 62 stages needed a person
Matching confidence
0.77
Across the 189 chains that were joined. 171 never found a second stage.

The chain, stage by stage

3 stages · the wait column is the gap before that stage began, measured on the chains that reached it

StageDocumentFunctionTowerSystemReachedWait beforeStage cycleConfidenceJoined by
1Requisition raisedpurchase-reqProcurementS2Ps2p-suite360 · 100%4.0 h
Origin 360
2Order placedvaluepurchase-orderProcurementS2Perp-mm189 · 53%22.9 h2.4 h0.77
Inferred 189
3Receipt postedgoods-receiptSupply ChainS2Perp-mm96 · 27%34.2 h6.9 h1.00
Keyed 96

The requisition is raised in the sourcing suite. The order and the receipt are both created in materials management and are held together by the order number. Nothing carries out of the sourcing suite, but the supplier is named on both sides of that step, so the join has something real to work with.

Chain state — an exhaustive partition of all 360 chains in this service into 4 states
Closed81 · 22.5%
Stalled273 · 75.8%
Open4 · 1.1%
Failed2 · 0.6%
How each chain was joined — a second exhaustive partition of the same 360 chains into 3 regimes
Inferred93 · 25.8%
Mixed96 · 26.7%
Single stage171 · 47.5%

The distribution, not the average

Cycle time across the 96 complete chains, in ten equal bands

27–40 h
3
40–53 h
17
53–66 h
22
66–79 h
26
79–92 h
17
92–105 h
7
105–118 h
2
118–131 h
0
131–144 h
1
144–158 h
1

Fastest 26.8 h, slowest 6.6 d, median 2.9 d, mean 2.9 d. The mean sits at or below the median, so quoting the average alone would understate what a typical chain of this service takes.

What the chain costs and carries

Cost is modeled from recorded touches. Value is the amount on the designated value stage only.

Cost, all chains
$4,170
Across all 360 assembled chains, complete or not
Value carried
$2.8m
Taken from stage 2, Order placed, and never summed across stages
Cost per $1,000 carried
$1.49
Modeled cost to serve against the value the chain moved
Carried an exception
44
Separately, 19 chains had work recorded twice

The commitment against this outcome

Requisition to receipt inside 4 days · owned by Diego Fuentes

Target
96 hours
Committed to The group operating committee
Observed
66.9 hours
Median on the chains that could be judged
Attainment
30.1%
135 breaches recorded
Status
Breaching
Reviewed by Diego Fuentes

Measured on the 193 chains that started early enough for the whole 96 hour commitment to fall inside the extract. Chains that started later are left out, because they could not have been seen to miss. Inside that set a chain still running past the commitment counts as a miss, not as pending.

This commitment sits alongside the function level service levels the estate already publishes, not instead of them. Every function inside this chain can hold its own commitment while this one misses.

The handoffs this service crosses

Mapped to the Source to Settle cross-flow · 4 handoffs

BoundaryMean waitReworkTyped in twiceWeekly costOwnerBasis
Procurement → Supply Chain34.1 h4%13%$164kDiego FuentesMeasured
Supply Chain → Financegate34.8 h15%13%$141kNobodyModeled
Finance → AI GBS21.1 h7%12%$49kSofia KalogeropoulouModeled
AI GBS → The supplier32.9 h9%64%$127kNobodyModeled

Who owns the delay

1 boundary disputes touch this service · 1 undecided

A receipt that never postsOpen

Requisitions close when the order is placed. Orders close when the goods arrive. Neither closes on a receipt that is never entered, and the invoice that follows cannot be matched. Procurement and the sites disagree about whose queue that sits in.

Procurement against Supply chain · arbiter Diego Fuentes · 26.8 h and $96k claimed by neither side

Trace one chain end to end

The 14 complete chains carrying the largest amounts. Open one to see every document, the wait before each stage and the moments a person intervened.

ChainCounterpartyMarketCycleWaitingCostPeopleJoined by
OI-RTR-0137Cressida SystemsGermany2.9 d2.6 d$4.560Mixed 0.86Trace
OI-RTR-0269Coalridge SystemsIndia3.6 d2.4 d$47.091Mixed 0.64Trace
OI-RTR-0125Stanhope CartonsMexico2.4 d2.0 d$15.191Mixed 0.86Trace
OI-RTR-0194Ostwald FreightArgentina46.6 h43.2 h$4.560Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0227Rothsay IndustriesChile2.5 d2.2 d$15.191Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0033Whitmore ChemicalsItaly3.6 d3.2 d$25.831Mixed 0.88Trace
OI-RTR-0161Calderon Production ServicesItaly4.3 d3.7 d$25.831Mixed 0.64Trace
OI-RTR-0008Kirchner EnergyBrazil2.0 d25.9 h$57.732Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0155Calderon Agency GroupCanada3.2 d2.0 d$78.992Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0172Barenholt TechnologyIndia2.6 d2.4 d$4.560Mixed 0.92Trace
OI-RTR-0024Northmoor ContainersNetherlands2.5 d2.3 d$4.560Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0050Ostwald LogisticsNetherlands44.5 h40.1 h$4.560Mixed 0.76Trace
OI-RTR-0029Calderon PackagingFrance3.2 d2.5 d$57.731Mixed 0.64Trace
OI-RTR-0097Lindqvist ContainersIndia3.7 d3.4 d$4.560Mixed 0.86Trace
What this page is, and what it is not

A receipt that never posts is the single largest cause of an invoice that cannot be matched, so the cost of a broken requisition chain is paid twice: once here in chasing, and again in the payment tower as an exception.

An outcome is assembled, not recorded. No source system in this estate stamps a single reference across a purchase requisition, the order raised against it and the receipt that closes it, so the chains on these pages were stitched together after the fact. Where both documents sit in the same source system the chain is keyed and the join is exact. Where it crosses a system boundary the chain is matched on the party, the market, the region and whether the timing is plausible, and it is labeled inferred with its confidence shown. Where the two sides name no party in common the only evidence left is place and timing, and the chain is labeled cohort and confidence is capped low on purpose. A cohort chain is a hypothesis about which documents belong together. Read it as one.

The ledger behind these chains is one week, 10 to 16 August 2026, which is 168 hours. A chain that had not finished when the week ended is open, not late: the week simply stopped watching it. A chain whose commitment falls after the end of the week could never have been seen to miss, so its service level reads not measurable rather than holding. Nothing on these pages should be read as a monthly or annual attainment.

Cost to serve is modeled from the touches the ledger recorded, not billed from a timesheet. Every touch is priced at 11 minutes of a person at a loaded 58 dollars an hour, and every stage carries 1.10 dollars of system cost and 0.42 dollars of inference. Handoff cost is priced separately: waiting is held at 0.90 dollars an item an hour, rework at 34 minutes, and duplicated data entry at the re-keying minutes recorded against that handoff. Change any of those six rates and every dollar on these pages moves.