LensReading which lens this session carries.

End-to-end outcomes · Close to report

Close to report

The chain that turns posted entries into a number somebody signs. Four of its five stages sit in finance and the last one does not, which is where it usually stops.

All outcomes
Starts when
The period accrual is posted
Ends when
The reported figure is certified
Accountable for the whole chain
Nils Andersen
Group financial controller · Finance
Crosses
FinanceITR2RD&A

Health

What the chain measures

Cycle time, wait and cost are computed on complete chains only. Everything else is computed on every assembled chain and says so.

Chains assembled
165
5 stages · 113 crossed more than one tower
Complete end to end
68.5%
113 chains found every stage
Median cycle
4.2 d
p25 3.7 d · p75 5.0 d · p90 6.1 d
Waiting
62%
2.8 d waiting against 41.3 h of work
Cost to serve
$36.68
$4,144 across the complete chains · 146 stages needed a person
Matching confidence
0.61
Across the 165 chains that were joined. 0 never found a second stage.

The chain, stage by stage

5 stages · the wait column is the gap before that stage began, measured on the chains that reached it

StageDocumentFunctionTowerSystemReachedWait beforeStage cycleConfidenceJoined by
1Accrual postedaccrualFinanceR2Rerp-fi165 · 100%7.1 h
Origin 165
2Entry recordedjournal-entryFinanceR2Rerp-fi165 · 100%12.6 h6.4 h1.00
Keyed 165
3Balances agreedintercompanyFinanceR2Rerp-fi155 · 94%18.8 h14.7 h1.00
Keyed 155
4Close task signedclose-taskFinanceR2Rfpa143 · 87%16.5 h9.8 h0.59
Cohort 143
5Report certifiedreport-certificationITD&Abi-semantic113 · 68%19.1 h13.0 h0.56
Cohort 113

The first three stages sit in the financial ledger and are held together by the ledger reference. The move into the planning tool and then into the reporting layer crosses a boundary each time, and no close document names a counterparty, so those steps have nothing to match on but place and timing.

Chain state — an exhaustive partition of all 165 chains in this service into 4 states
Closed102 · 61.8%
Stalled28 · 17.0%
Open30 · 18.2%
Failed5 · 3.0%
How each chain was joined — a second exhaustive partition of the same 165 chains into 2 regimes
Keyed22 · 13.3%
Cohort143 · 86.7%

The distribution, not the average

Cycle time across the 113 complete chains, in ten equal bands

52–73 h
6
73–94 h
33
94–115 h
37
115–136 h
21
136–157 h
9
157–178 h
4
178–199 h
0
199–220 h
1
220–241 h
1
241–262 h
1

Fastest 2.2 d, slowest 10.9 d, median 4.2 d, mean 4.5 d. The mean sits above the median, so quoting the average alone would overstate what a typical chain of this service takes.

What the chain costs and carries

Cost is modeled from recorded touches. Value is the amount on the designated value stage only.

Cost, all chains
$6,815
Across all 165 assembled chains, complete or not
Value carried
None booked
No stage of this service carries a monetary amount, so cost to serve has no denominator here
Cost per $1,000 carried
Not computable without a value stage
Carried an exception
67
Separately, 39 chains had work recorded twice

The commitment against this outcome

Close to report inside 10 days · owned by Nils Andersen

Target
240 hours
Committed to The group operating committee
Observed
101.3 hours
Median on the chains that could be judged
Attainment
0 breaches recorded
Status
Not measurable
Reviewed by Nils Andersen

Not measurable from this extract. The commitment runs to 10 days and the extract covers seven, so no chain in the week had the whole commitment available and none could have been seen to miss it. 102 chains did close inside the window, at a median of 101.3 hours, which describes the fast chains and says nothing about the slow ones.

This commitment sits alongside the function level service levels the estate already publishes, not instead of them. Every function inside this chain can hold its own commitment while this one misses.

Who owns the delay

1 boundary disputes touch this service · 1 undecided

The certification stage sits outside the closeScheduled

Four of the five close stages are owned by finance. The fifth, certifying the reported figure, is owned by the reporting layer, which does not attend the close meeting and has no close deadline of its own.

Finance against Information technology · arbiter Nils Andersen · 12.5 h claimed by neither side, with no dollar figure against it

Trace one chain end to end

The 14 complete chains carrying the largest amounts. Open one to see every document, the wait before each stage and the moments a person intervened.

ChainCounterpartyMarketCycleWaitingCostPeopleJoined by
OI-CTR-0046Not namedTurkey3.6 d2.9 d$7.600Cohort 0.52Trace
OI-CTR-0083Not namedNetherlands4.8 d3.0 d$71.403Cohort 0.52Trace
OI-CTR-0119Not namedItaly4.2 d3.4 d$28.871Cohort 0.42Trace
OI-CTR-0121Not namedUnited States3.4 d2.7 d$7.600Cohort 0.60Trace
OI-CTR-0123Not namedChina4.3 d2.8 d$18.231Cohort 0.30Trace
OI-CTR-0124Not namedNigeria9.4 d2.3 d$92.672Cohort 0.30Trace
OI-CTR-0082Not namedMexico5.5 d3.2 d$39.502Cohort 0.60Trace
OI-CTR-0032Not namedFrance4.0 d2.1 d$39.501Cohort 0.52Trace
OI-CTR-0033Not namedFrance4.0 d3.2 d$7.600Cohort 0.52Trace
OI-CTR-0034Not namedFrance3.5 d2.1 d$39.502Cohort 0.62Trace
OI-CTR-0035Not namedPoland4.5 d3.8 d$7.600Cohort 0.60Trace
OI-CTR-0001Not namedUnited Kingdom6.8 d3.3 d$71.402Cohort 0.60Trace
OI-CTR-0002Not namedUnited States3.7 d2.6 d$18.231Cohort 0.60Trace
OI-CTR-0008Not namedGermany4.1 d2.4 d$39.501Cohort 0.62Trace
What this page is, and what it is not

The close is the only chain in the estate with a statutory deadline, and the only one where the last stage is owned by a function that does not attend the close meeting.

An outcome is assembled, not recorded. No source system in this estate stamps a single reference across a purchase requisition, the order raised against it and the receipt that closes it, so the chains on these pages were stitched together after the fact. Where both documents sit in the same source system the chain is keyed and the join is exact. Where it crosses a system boundary the chain is matched on the party, the market, the region and whether the timing is plausible, and it is labeled inferred with its confidence shown. Where the two sides name no party in common the only evidence left is place and timing, and the chain is labeled cohort and confidence is capped low on purpose. A cohort chain is a hypothesis about which documents belong together. Read it as one.

The ledger behind these chains is one week, 10 to 16 August 2026, which is 168 hours. A chain that had not finished when the week ended is open, not late: the week simply stopped watching it. A chain whose commitment falls after the end of the week could never have been seen to miss, so its service level reads not measurable rather than holding. Nothing on these pages should be read as a monthly or annual attainment.

Cost to serve is modeled from the touches the ledger recorded, not billed from a timesheet. Every touch is priced at 11 minutes of a person at a loaded 58 dollars an hour, and every stage carries 1.10 dollars of system cost and 0.42 dollars of inference. Handoff cost is priced separately: waiting is held at 0.90 dollars an item an hour, rework at 34 minutes, and duplicated data entry at the re-keying minutes recorded against that handoff. Change any of those six rates and every dollar on these pages moves.