LensReading which lens this session carries.
Research & Development/External Collaboration

Sub-function

External Collaboration

Owns collaboration work end to end inside Research & Development. Runs 3 lines across 19 stations, drains the repeatable share into no shared tower, and holds 6 human gates.

orchestrator Collaboration Orchestratorhuman owner Director, External Innovationno shared tower — judgment density too high

Estate rating

A

75 / 100

autonomy 61%cap 70%

Scouting and milestone tracking are agentic. Anything that shares data or publishes results outside the company is cleared by counsel every time.

Agents

8

Lines

3

Units / wk

6,778

Timetable vs actual

16.7h → 14.6h

Cost / unit

$3.65

was $12

Run-rate saving

$2.9M

annualized at this volume

The 8 agents running this sub-function

Grouped by what they are for, not by where they sit. The agent org is process-shaped.

OrchestratorOwns the queue and arbitrates between desks.

Collaboration Orchestrator

Owns the external collaboration lane end to end. Sequences the other agents, holds the timetable, and decides what surfaces to a human.

ObserveA2195 / 24h95%10% ovr$3.87/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

TaskExecutes stations on a line.

Partner Scouting Agent

Executes the external collaboration step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.

WorkflowA23,586 / 24h89%8% ovr$0.49/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Agreement Coordination Agent

Executes the external collaboration step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.

WorkflowA22,166 / 24h95%6% ovr$0.17/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Milestone Tracking Agent

Executes the external collaboration step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.

WorkflowA23,439 / 24h92%8% ovr$0.07/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Data Sharing Agent

Executes the external collaboration step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.

WorkflowA21,229 / 24h98%8% ovr$0.18/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

Publication Review Agent

Executes the external collaboration step it owns, posts its evidence, and hands the unit to the next stage.

WorkflowA2690 / 24h97%5% ovr$0.04/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates to Director, External Innovation when the unit falls outside the decision envelope or confidence drops below the floor.

StrategyForms and defends a position.

Partner Strategy Agent

Authors positions on external collaboration. Frames the question, models the options, and writes a recommendation a human can ratify or reject.

StrategyA293 / 24h94%11% ovr$7.34/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates when two options sit inside the confidence band and the evidence cannot separate them.

ChallengerPaid to disagree before a human has to.

External Collaboration Challenger Agent

Adversarial reviewer for external collaboration. Argues the opposite case on every position and flags where the evidence does not carry the claim.

StrategyA2120 / 24h88%16% ovr$11/task

ceiling A2 · escalates to Escalates when a ratified position is still running against a break condition it flagged.

Estate rating breakdown

Seven control dimensions. Judgment readiness runs against autonomy on purpose.

Control Coverage70
Evidence Quality68
Override Discipline79
Data Integrity93
Recovery Readiness76
Cost Transparency66
Judgment Readiness75

People

What the humans stopped doing, and what they do now.

headcount on this work34.723.2 FTE

Redeployed into scenario work and strategy authoring review.

inference cost per unit$0.59

Lines running in this sub-function

Each line is a workflow. Click a line to walk it station by station.

10 clear4 evidenced4 held
RD9AResearch Collaboration SetupTransactional · 7 stations

Identify partner

2 live

Scope work

45 q

Agreement

26 q

IP terms review

2 live

Sign

8 q

Kick off

1 live

Track milestones

14 q

RD9BData Sharing RequestTransactional · 6 stations

Request

1 live

Classify sensitivity

1 live

Privacy check

8 q

Approve

2 live

Share

36 q

Log

3 live

RD9CPublication ClearanceTransactional · 6 stations

Submit draft

28 q

IP screen

1 live

Competitive screen

1 live

Counsel review

5 q

Approve

2 live

Publish

2 live

Strategy positions this sub-function holds

An agent that only executes is a robot. These are the calls it made, the argument against each one, and what would prove it wrong.

RD9-POS-100

External Collaboration Operating Position

Supersededv2

What operating shape carries twice the current collaboration volume without adding headcount, and what breaks first if we are wrong?

Hold the ceiling at A2 for external collaboration. Scouting and milestone tracking are agentic. Anything that shares data or publishes results outside the company is cleared by counsel every time. Raise it only after two consecutive quarters where the override rate stays under five percent and every override has a written cause.

confidence

85%

The challenge — External Collaboration Challenger Agent

External Collaboration Challenger Agent argues the recommendation leans on 5 quarters of data from a period with no volume shock. The confidence band overlaps the alternative, and the position does not say what it would take to be wrong. Recorded as a dissent, not a block.

Break conditions

  • ·Override rate rises above 9 percent for two consecutive months
  • ·Cost per collaboration stops falling while volume keeps rising
  • ·A control failure in this lane reaches a customer or a regulator

Evidence gaps

  • ·No independent test of the control evidence behind the touchless rate
Alternative consideredCostRiskVerdict
Hold the current position$319k run rateKnown and priced. Cedes ground if comparators move faster.live
Raise the ceiling one level now$1789k to build controlsOverride rate is 4 percent; raising the ceiling before that settles imports the error into production.rejected on evidence
Move the exception tail to the spine$986k transitionLoses local context. Rework risk on the cases that are hardest to recover.under review
authored by Partner Strategy Agentratifier Director, External Innovation3 stated assumptions

Policy register

The rules the agents above are bound by. Version, owner, approver, and the agents each rule constrains.

RefRuleScopeOwner agentApproved byVersionStatus
RD9-POL-200

External Collaboration Decision Envelope

Agents in this lane may act without a human when the collaboration sits inside the stated value, risk and confidence envelope. Outside it, the unit holds at a gate with a named approver and a running clock.

binds 5 agents · US · Canada

envelopeCollaboration OrchestratorDirector, External Innovationv5.4Active
RD9-POL-201

External Collaboration Evidence Standard

Every autonomous decision writes inputs, the rule version applied, the model and prompt version, the output and a reversal path. An action with no evidence record is treated as a control failure, not a fast decision.

binds 5 agents · APAC

evidenceCollaboration OrchestratorDirector, External Innovationv2.3Active
RD9-POL-202

External Collaboration Escalation Rule

Escalation is mandatory when confidence falls below the floor, when two options sit inside the confidence band, or when a break condition on a ratified position fires. Director, External Innovation owns the response clock.

binds 5 agents · US · Canada

escalationCollaboration OrchestratorDirector, External Innovationv2.6Active